RonRolheiser,OMI

The Conspiracy of Accidents Through Which God Speaks

A A A

A woman once shared this story in one of my classes:

She had been raised in a religious home and had been a regular churchgoer. However, during her years at university her interest and practice in religion had progressively slipped so that by the time of her graduation she no longer attended church or prayed much. This indifference to prayer and church-going continued for several years after her graduation. Her story focused on how that changed.

One day, nearly four years after having given up all practice of prayer and churchgoing, she flew to Colorado to visit her sister and to do some skiing. She arrived on a Saturday evening and the next morning, Sunday, her sister invited her to come to church with her. She politely refused and went skiing instead.

On her first run down the slope, she hit a tree and broke her leg. Sporting a huge cast, she was released from hospital the following Saturday. The next morning, her sister again asked her to come to church with her. This time (“there wasn’t much else to do”) she accepted. As chance would have it, it was Good Shepherd Sunday and as chance (again) would have it, there happened to be a priest visiting from Israel. He could not see her sitting near the back with her leg in cast, and yet he began his homily this way:

“There’s a custom among shepherds in Israel that existed at the time of Jesus and is still sometimes practiced today that highlights a hidden aspect of a good shepherd. Sometimes a shepherd senses that a young lamb is going to be a congenital stray, forever drifting away from the flock. What the shepherd does then is deliberately break one of its legs so that he has to carry it until its leg is healed. By that time, the lamb becomes so attached to the shepherd that it never strays again.”

“I may be dense!” concluded this woman, “but, given my broken leg and all this chance coincidence, hearing this awoke something inside me. Fifteen years have passed since then and I have prayed and gone to church regularly ever since!”

James Mackey once suggested that divine providence is “a conspiracy of accidents through which God speaks.” What this woman experienced that Sunday was precisely the language of God, divine providence, God speaking to her through a conspiracy of accidents.

Today the concept of divine providence tends to be ignored or misunderstood. Some Christians identify it with an unhealthy fatalism (“If God wants my child to live he will not let it die. We won’t take the medical procedure”). Others connect it to an unhealthy theology of God (“God sent AIDS into the world as a punishment for our sexual promiscuity! God sends us natural and personal disasters to bring us back to true values!”)

But these are false concepts of God and of God’s providence. God does not start fires, or floods, or wars, or AIDS, or anything else of this nature to smarten us up and bring us back to true values. Nature, chance, human freedom, and human sin bring these things to pass.

However, to say that God does not initiate or cause these things is not the same thing as saying that God does not speak through them. God speaks through chance events, both disastrous and advantageous. Past generations, like my parents’ generation, more easily understood this.

For example, my parents were farmers. For them, like for Abraham and Sarah of old, there were no mere accidents; in everything there was always providence and the finger of God. If they had a good crop, God was blessing them. If they had a poor crop, well, they concluded that God wanted them to live on less for a while for some good reason. And they would always in the deep parts of their minds and hearts try to discern that reason.

When Jesus invites us to “read the signs of the times”, he is not suggesting an intellectual exercise wherein we try to articulate for ourselves how the cultural, political, social, and religious movements are shaping our times. That could indeed be a good thing, but that’s not what Jesus is inviting us to do. Rather he is inviting us to look at the events in our personal lives and in the life of the world and, as a deep form of prayer, try to discern what the finger of God is writing through those events.

In the conspiracy of accidents that make up our ordinary lives, the finger of God is writing. John of the Cross says that “the language of God is the experience God writes into our lives.  As a form of prayer, we need to look at the conspiracy of accidents in our lives and ask ourselves: “What is God saying to us in all of this?”

And hopefully it won’t take a broken leg for us to get the message.

An Irritated Melancholy

A A A

We live in a world where, as Karl Rahner says, our lives are always an unfinished symphony. In this life there is no final fulfillment. Mostly we are unconscious of that, and also unaware this creates a certain gap inside us that makes us grasp greedily at life.

But certain things can help bring this to our consciousness, for example, poetry and music. Charles-Pierre Baudelaire, 1821-1867, a French poet, essayist, and art critic, once said this of poetry and music: “It is both by poetry and through poetry, by and through music, that the soul glimpses the splendor beyond the grave; and when an exquisite poem brings tears to the edge of the eyes, these tears are not  the proof of an excess of enjoyment, they are rather the testimony of an irritated melancholy, of a postulation of the nerves of a nature exiled in the imperfect and which we would like to seize immediately, on this earth, a revealed paradise.”

Wow! What a different language! Poetry and music as irritating our melancholy in a way that makes us aware of the limits of our lives, even as they simultaneously trigger a sense of what heaven will be, and how we would like to be there right now.

Baudelaire uses the word “melancholy” to name what we feel because of this gap in our lives, but is that the best word for what we’re feeling? Is it melancholy? Is it sadness? Or might it be better named? Indeed, it has been given many names.

St. Augustine, for instance, would not name it as a sadness, but as longing, an aching, a restlessness. As he puts it in his famous dictum: You have made us for yourself Lord, and our hearts are restless until they rest in you. That’s its signature expression. But there are others.

A number of French spiritual writers call it a disquiet, a dis-ease; the biblical writer Qoheleth calls it a timelessness inside us that perpetually puts us out of sync with natural rhythms of time; the young Anne Frank, writing in her diary, simply named it an energy that made her want to jump out of her own skin and want to be everywhere all at once; the wise old Ruth Burrows called it “tortured complexity”; the scientist/mystic Pierre Teilhard de Chardin called it “an irresistible, hallowing, which makes everyone cry out: ‘Lord, make us one’”; and Frederick Buechner called it “a subterranean presence”  beneath the surface that’s  not like a brass band announcing itself, but is something which comes and touches and strikes in ways that leaves us free to either not even notice it or to draw back from it.

What’s its origin? Where does this come from? It is, as St. Augustine says, the ache that tells us that we are made for God and that this world is not our final home. But this is not inside us as a sadness, a melancholy, or a darkness. The opposite. It’s inside us as an excess of energy, an excess of light, a luminosity.

This is its origin: As Christians, we believe we are made in the image and likeness of God. However, too often we imagine this simplistically as some beautiful icon stamped inside our soul rather than as divine fire, a touch of infinity, an insatiable godly energy in us that lets us know we are more than our biology and more than the physics of this world. It also assures we will never find full consummation in this world. We are built for more.

Now this can be experienced as a sadness, as a melancholy, but paradoxically that’s because its excessive light makes for a dark shadow. When we speak of the shadow inside us with which we are frightened to engage, it’s really our luminosity, the image of God inside us, we are talking about. We’re afraid of the godly light inside us. It’s too much to cope with.

The poet Marianne Williamson captures this in her poem Our Deepest Fear:

Our deepest fear is not that we are inadequate.
Our deepest fear is that we are powerful beyond measure.
It is our light, not our darkness
That most frightens us.

We ask ourselves
Who am I to be brilliant, gorgeous, talented, fabulous?
Actually, who are you not to be?
You are a child of God.

Your playing small
Does not serve the world.
There’s nothing enlightened about shrinking
So that other people won’t feel insecure around you.

We are all meant to shine,
As children do.
We were born to make manifest
The glory of God that is within us.

It’s not just in some of us;
It’s in everyone.

And as we let our own light shine,
We unconsciously give other people permission to do the same.
As we’re liberated from our own fear,
Our presence automatically liberates others.

This is not exactly a sadness, but it is indeed an irritated melancholy that makes us aware of just how much light there’s inside us.

Toward an Understanding of Suicide

A A A

Every year I try to write an article on suicide because it is perhaps the most misunderstood of all deaths and it wreaks a unique havoc among the family and the loved ones left behind.

They are left with a blizzard of ambivalent and conflicting feelings: shame (What a shameful way to die); guilt (Somehow I should have done more); second-guessing (Why wasn’t I more attentive?); anger (This was an act of selfishness); and anxiety (How can this person go to heaven?) Moreover, in effect, this ruins the memory the person who died by suicide.

Throughout my articles on suicide and my book (Bruised & Wounded: Struggling to Understand Suicide) I have tried to emphasize that in most cases of suicide:

  • We are dealing with an extremely sensitive and wounded person, someone who at one level is too bruised to touch.
  • In suicide, a person dies against his or her will, akin to jumping out of a high-rise window because your clothing is on fire.
  • A death by suicide is the emotional and psychological equivalent of cancer, stroke, or heart-attack. For this reason we no longer use the verb “committed” suicide since we never say that someone committed cancer, or a stroke, or a heart attack. Suicide, in most cases, is not a voluntary act.
  • In many cases too, suicidal depression has a biochemical root.
  • We need not worry about that person’s eternal salvation. He or she had a good heart and God reads the heart. Sometimes a person can descend into a state into which the best of human love, medicine, and psychiatry can no longer reach, but faith assures us that there is no depressive hell that God cannot descend into and breathe out peace.
  • We need to give ourselves permission to feel all the ambivalent feelings we will have about our loved one and his or her manner of death. That’s a healthy grieving process that should not be short-circuited. Eventually the memory of our loved one and his or her spirit will come to us in peace and understanding.
  • Our task, after our grieving period, is to redeem the memory of our loved one so that our loved one’s life is not seen and judged through the prism of his or her death. Put their photos back up on the walls, no longer speak of them in hushed tones, celebrate their lives, and speak healthily of the special spirit they brought into the world.

Margaret Atwood once said that sometimes things need to be said, and said, and said again, until they don’t need to be said anymore. These points on suicide still need to be said.

Beyond these assertions, let me add two more perspectives on suicide that I have found helpful.

The first one is a lesson from nature. Here’s Elilf Shafak, a botanist, reflecting on the suicide of his friend’s mother: “When I was a young botanist, I was asked to diagnose a tree that was not doing well. It seemed to be dying. After many tests, nothing conclusive, I took a shovel and began to dig, and I learned a lesson I have never forgotten, girdlingwas happening below the surface. The tree was being strangled by its own roots. If the encircling roots are not found on time, they start putting pressure on the tree and it just becomes too much to bear. …  Your mother’s death has nothing to do with the absence of love. She was blooming and thriving with your love, and I’d like to believe with mine too, but underneath something was strangling her: the past, the memories, the roots.”

Sometimes our own roots (complexity, trauma, confusion, frustration, biology) can be so overpowering that they work at killing the body. As James Hillman writes in his book Suicide and the Soul, sometimes there are deep things inside us that cannot make themselves heard and their frustration eventually works to strangle the body. Our own roots are sometimes such a complex mixture of soul and biology that we begin to asphyxiate.

The second thought comes from Jeffrey Monroe in his book Reading Buechner: Exploring the Work of a Master Memoirist, Novelist, Theologian, and Preacher. Frederick Buechner, a Christian pastor, had to deal with his dad’s suicide. As a son, as man of faith, as a pastor trying to help others understand, he searched for answers vis-à-vis his dad’s suicide. The answers didn’t come easily, or seemingly at all. Eventually, Buechner came to this understanding of his dad’s suicide.

The best pastoral answer in the face of inexplicable tragedy (his dad’s suicide) isn’t an answer at all. It’s a presence.On this side of eternity, we won’t get all the answers, not least to the question of suicide. Sometimes there is no satisfactory answer in our darkest moments, like when we lose a loved one to suicide. What matters most in those dark moments is that we can trust that God did not abandon our loved one. And what we desire more than answers is God.